Catholic Prayers to Reinvigorate a Long-Term Relationship

Prayer is not exclusive to Catholicism, nor is it exclusive to Christianity. But one of the main ways that Catholicism differentiates itself from many other sects of Christianity, or other religions in general, is that the Catholic Church has prayers that are specially designed for specific situations. They are crafted with care and intended to bring peace to the troubled and joy to the celebrant. Prayers for relationships are no different. They are the Catholic answers to complex relationship-related questions.

After you’ve met your match during a church event, out and about with friends, on a Catholic singles dating website, or even through the church itself, you may enter a long-term relationship with that person. You may find a sense of joy, comfort, and solace with that person that you haven’t felt with another person. This, coupled with a joined strong Catholic faith, is where the seeds of a great relationship start.

As we are but human, anyone in a long-term relationship may find that they become used to their partner. While this may be a good thing in a great many ways, it can also become a bad thing if the relationship seems monotonous or mechanical. Within these feelings lie the seeds of temptation – temptation to cheat, temptation to divorce, and other disastrous temptations that can break the holiest of bonds.

When you are in a long-term relationship with a man or woman who, like yourself, is strong in the Catholic faith, consider visiting or revisiting the following four Catholic prayers from time to time, in order to keep your relationship fresh, bring your eyes back to God, and restore your faith in Jesus Christ.

Prayer for the Virtue of Chastity

This prayer is not specific to the wedded couple; it can serve as a reminder of your struggles to stay chaste and pure while waiting for the right person to come along. While you may consider it as a reminder of your sacrifices on the way to becoming the perfect partner for another, it should also allow you to consider the sacrifice and hardship they went through to stay chaste and pure for you.

With doubts in your mind about whether or not your partner has sacrificed, or gone through struggles to maintain a happy and functional relationship, you may lose a sense of mutual love and respect. This can spell disaster for a relationship. Not only should you have a view of your own hardships, you should understand what they’ve done to keep the relationship healthy. This will reinvigorate your sense of love for their nobility and overall character while keeping your eyes toward what God has wanted for you both all along.

Prayer for a Good Husband or Wife

This is a prayer largely designed for singles, but it can be revisited well within a relationship in order to see your partner in the way you saw him or her when you first met.

The prayer will reinvigorate your relationship by reminding you of who you wanted to find when searching for a partner. It truly brings the virtues of the person back home when you need them the most. The Prayer for a Good Husband or Wife reminds you to look at the one you are with, take an inventory of their character, and see them as you saw them the first time.

Whether saying this prayer aloud, or to yourself, together, reevaluate your partner. Are they wise, kind, loyal, noble, and sincere? Do they help you keep your feet firmly within the church? Do you do the same for them? Asking and answering these questions honestly is a great way to look gratefully and passionately at your partner; giving you the drive to push forward, ever in the light of the Holy Spirit.

Sacrament of Matrimony

Though this isn’t a prayer, it is one of the Seven Sacraments and it can reinvigorate your relationship, just as a prayer would.

The Sacrament of Matrimony takes a look at your wedded life through the view of Jesus and in the eyes of God. It reminds you that God made Adam, and through Adam, Eve. With this reminder, you will once again understand how you and your partner are two parts of one another and both brought forth by the wondrous power of God.

This Sacrament will remind you and your partner that you were made for one another by God and that both of you should thank Him every day for the fact that you are in each others lives. Not only does this focus the gaze of you and your partner upward, toward God, it reinvigorates your relationship by giving it a renewed sense of divine purpose and greater meaning.

Furthermore, you will find that the Sacrament emphasizes the eternal bond of marriage that you both share. Through this, you will further revitalize your relationship with the knowledge that your bond is one that cannot be broken and will last for eternity in glory and happiness.

Prayer to Heal a Relationship

Ideally, a relationship would be easy; unfortunately, this is not an ideal world and is blighted by sin. This means that relationships, even ones that are holy and wonderful in the eyes of God and the Catholic Church, are sometimes difficult and complicated. Avoiding complications and difficulty should certainly be a goal, but it should be accepted that problems will arise and that they must be overcome.

Even in the best relationships, there may be a time when one party transgresses against the other, or both offend the other in some way. This is an unfortunate, but unavoidable, part of the relationship process. After all, sometimes we find a purpose in suffering and strength in the resolution.

The Prayer to Heal a Relationship can be recited by one or both parties in a relationship, in solitude, or together, in order to mend any ill feelings that are infecting the relationship. It reminds those involved to seek tranquility, understanding, and forgiveness.

This prayer will allow the person, or people meditating, to realign their relationship with the purpose bestowed upon it by God.  It will also serve as a reminder that the relationship casts an indelible mark on the partners, friends, family, and children, and should not be taken lightly. Through this prayer, you will find your relationship reinvigorated and rejuvenated in the light of peace and understanding.

5 Catholic Prayers to Get You Through the Day

One of the blessings of living out the Catholic faith is having the ability to go before the Lord in prayer. Prayer helps the mind to be more focused on what matters and forges a way for the faithful to be changed by the Lord for the better.

All throughout the Holy Scriptures examples of prayer can be found. Throughout the history of the Church, prayer has been a pillar of the faith. The holy communion found with the Lord through prayer has been known to lead to miracles, even in the day to day.

How Prayer Helps Everyday

Everyone faces challenges on a daily basis. Some are major difficulties, like dealing with chronic health issues or financial challenges. Others seem more minor. For example, finding the patience to be loving towards difficult family members can feel impossible. However, God can grant patience.

When people of faith take the time to pray on a daily basis, they can experience the miracle of the Lord’s intervention in their lives. Many people report that daily prayer leads to greater feelings of peace and contentment. Such spiritual changes can affect the rest of a person’s daily life, giving them greater success and purpose at the go about their ordinary routine.

5 Prayers to Remember

Some of the situations and challenges that most people face every day certainly warrant prayer. Interacting with others at home and at work, for example, can require the help of the Lord. Get into the habit of praying using these 5 helpful, everyday prayer types.

1. A Prayer for Your Family

A multitude of prayers exist to help people pray to the Lord about their family. Some prayers are focused on problems within the family, like discord or relationship failures. Many are written for specifically for wives, husbands, parents, and children.

Common prayers for the family include:

  • Consecration of Families to the Sacred Heart
  • Husband’s Common Prayer
  • Wife’s Common Prayer
  • The Prayer for the Family

In each of these prayers, the family is commended unto the Lord. Biblical examples, such as those of Mary and Joseph, are included in the prayers to give direction and to express humility. Another hallmark of Catholic prayer for the family is the acknowledgement of God’s Holy design for the family unit and each family member.

2. A Prayer for Your Work

Heading into work each day, many people have need for prayer. Whether it’s for dealing well with co-workers and authority figures, or having the diligence and humility to complete the day’s tasks, praying before work is a great idea.

Two popular Catholic prayers for work are:

The Prayer for Success In Work

A prayer to the glorious Saint Joseph, this petition asks the Lord to “obtain for me the grace to work conscientiously, putting the call of duty above my many sins; to work with thankfulness and joy.” Other lines in the prayer pertain to using time and talents effectively.

The Prayer for God’s Blessing of One’s Daily Work

Simple and short, this prayer asks that one’s work would be pleasing to God and fitting of Christ’s sacrifice. It also looks to Saint Joseph as an example.

3. A Prayer for Your Daily Frustrations

One of the most important prayers to engage in as a person of the Catholic faith is a daily prayer that deals with life’s frustrations. Frustration often builds into sin, and frustration occurs daily over many very small and really large things.

To live within the grace of the Lord and remain holy despite the many temptations of frustration, many Catholics rely on traditional daily prayers like:

  • The Lord’s Prayer
  • Hail Mary
  • The Rosary
  • The Apostle’s Creed
  • Morning Prayers

There are also prayers that more specifically address the issue of dealing with frustration and anger. An example of such a prayer includes the Prayer in A Time of Anger. This prayer acknowledges one’s sin and asks for the Lord’s help with calming down and overcoming such weakness and temptation.

4. A Prayer for Peace in the Lord

Remaining at peace in the bustling, busy world can be a challenge that many people face daily as well. Just as there are moments of frustration throughout the day, there are also moments when people need to experience the peace that the Lord offers.

Positivity resulting from gaining peace in the Lord is often reported to turn one’s day around. A sense of peacefulness can improve one’s outlook on life and one’s attitude toward others. Traditional prayers for peace include descriptions of the beauty of God’s creation and his works.

Examples of prayers for peace include:

  • The Prayer for Peace of Mind
  • The Serenity Prayer
  • Teach Us to Love Prayer
  • The Prayer of Everyday I Need You Lord
  • Prayer for Justice and Peace

5. A Prayer of Thanks

Catholics recognize God as the creator of all things. God’s intervention in their daily lives is important and worthy of praise. Many Catholics choose to spend time in prayer thanking the Lord. Some give thanks before every meal or after other prayers are answered.

Prayers of thanks remind Catholics of the many things they can thank God for and create an avenue for praise. Popular prayers of thanks include:

  • Prayers taken directly from the Holy Bible
  • The Short Thanksgiving Prayer
  • A Prayer in Gratitude
  • Prayer in Appreciation of Each Other

Suggestions for a Deeper Prayer Time

According to the Catechism, “faith cannot live without prayer.” New and seasoned Catholics are encouraged to take part in prayer every day. Spending such time in prayer is an excellent choice for many reasons, including:

  • Listening to what God has to say in order to learn from him and his influence
  • Growing in the Catholic faith
  • Surrendering to God all that one cannot handle righteously
  • Asking for the regular forgiveness of sins
  • Improving relationships with those around oneself

It is recommended that these daily prayers be made while reading Scripture and spending time quietly and alone. Some people find resources like a rosary helpful for staying focused in prayer as well.

The Importance of Women in the Catholic Church

The role of women in Catholicism cannot be understated. After all, the Blessed Mother Mary is one of the most venerated people in all of Christendom, particularly Catholicism. To modern Catholics, she represents the grace, purity, and strength that all women should strive to have. She also is the quintessential mother, who raised Jesus Christ.

In the centuries since, the role of women inside and outside of the Catholic Church has changed dramatically. No longer are women beholden to the patriarchy of the past; the Church has led the way on many of these reforms.

There are many questions regarding what the Church says about women’s roles, and theologians have tackled the answer at length. The essence of the Catholic Church’s answer is that women are the equal counterparts of men and have the same expectations as men: follow Jesus above all else (Luke 10:38-42). Ultimately, the Church believes that all are one and of equal worth and dignity (Galatians 3:28), which is indicated by the fact that Jesus told the women he passed to endure while he was on his way to the Crucifixion, as noted in the Eighth Station.

The Givers of Life

Women are assigned a very special role in bringing up a child: they physically bring forth life. This is one of the utmost blessings that can be bestowed on a person, and it’s given exclusively to women!

Because of this, mothers hold a very special place in the hearts of their children. After all, children were raised from contraception by their mothers. This produces an instinctual bond that cannot be broken.

Because of the fact that women are ordained by God to be the givers of life, men are taught to fashion a bond of their own by being instillers of spiritual life. This is especially important when referring to the priesthood and the unique bond that can be cultivated through spiritual birth. This augments the role of women as the givers of life and emphasizes the dual and cooperative nature of men and women in the Church.

Catholic Prayer: The Fertility Blessing – From conception to birth, every step of the way should be taken with God in mind.


Regarding raising children, women again have a special role that is based around human nature. Since the dawn of time, men have been hunters, protectors, and providers, while women have had an inclination towards caregiving, comforting, and nurturing. This is true across temporal and cultural boundaries, and it rings true today.

While the Church believes in the distinctive roles of men and women, modern times make this distinction a bit more flexible. There are times when the father must take on the traditionally female role and the woman must venture off to take on more of a masculine role. This brings about more of a mutual understanding and respect between men and women, cultivating further harmony and a sense of egalitarianism within the home.

Catholic Prayer: Prayer for Expectant Mothers – Although this prayer is intended for expecting mothers, it speaks volumes to those with children. It emphasizes the role of Mary in Jesus’ life and how important it is for a mother to teach her children in the way that Mary taught Jesus.

Within the Church

Without the people of the Church, everything would come to a halt. There is no devaluing the role of men and women in the Church, though there are distinct roles for each.

As mentioned, men are to give spiritual birth to those around them. The role of women, on the other hand, is to build a foundation that provides continuing education and the installation of virtues, making the Church’s values unassailable in the minds of parishioners.

In Romans, Paul particularly lauded the women of the Church and praised their support in his time of need. The Church recognizes their majority role in Catholicism and venerates them, saints them, and beatifies them as readily as men. After all, Joan of Arc and Mother Teresa are two of the first names to spring to mind when many think of the people of Catholicism.

Catholic Prayer: Prayer for Vocations – When considering your role within the Church, be inspired to make a continuing contribution to the Word of God.

The Role in Marriage

The woman’s role in marriage is complex and multifaceted, as is the man’s. For both, it is a sacred covenant between the individual and God that cannot be broken. To continue a healthy marriage, each party must value the other’s contribution to the whole. This requires recognition of each other’s equal, if different, vocation in the sacred bond of marriage.

The foundation of a solid marriage is a solid Catholic faith. For both men and women, it is advisable to meet a partner where Catholics congregate: Catholic outings, Catholic meetings, or even Catholic singles dating websites, to name a few. Finding a Catholic partner will play a large role in cultivating the mutual respect and willingness to sacrifice that is necessary for a long future together.

Once married, the woman is to stand on equal footing with the man, but in the role of the caregiver and the future mother. It is the duty of the Catholic woman to nurture and care for the man while each partner keeps the other from going astray from the tenants of the Church because, again, above all is a wholehearted devotion to Jesus Christ.

Catholic Prayer: Nuptial Prayer – In the happily married home, women are to strengthen weakness through stern discipline and know the Word of God so that the family never strays from its one earthly duty.

As you can see, a woman’s place in the Church is extremely varied, interesting, and multifaceted. Because the Church is egalitarian, it lacks the trappings that bring forth conflict and disharmony in other religious teachings. Being a Catholic woman does not mean that one has to lose her identity and only be known in relation to a man (the sister/mother/daughter of…); instead she is encouraged to be autonomous and individual with a strong foundation in the Church and the Word of God.

The Official Catholic Stance on Divorce

Unlike many other Christian denominations, the Catholic Church has very specific rules regarding marriage, divorce, annulment, and much more. In fact, the rules of Catholic marriage determine that couples cannot get married in the Catholic Church unless one or both parties are Catholic. If one party if not Catholic, certain requirements must be met or the partner must be approved of by a bishop.

The Catholic Church’s protections of the sanctity of marriage do not stop there. In the view of the Catholic Church, marriage is a holy sacrament. Known as the sacrament of matrimony, Catholic marriages involve a couple being unified in Christ forever, as sealed by the Holy Spirit. As a result, the concept of divorce is taken very seriously.

How the Catholic Church Views Divorce

Although there are many Catholics living as divorcees, the Catholic Church does not actually recognize divorce as existing in faith. Members of the Church may get a divorce in a civil sense, even legally. However, according to the Church, the seal of the Holy Spirit, and the holy covenant of marriage, that couple will forever be married.

The practice of the Catholic Church denying divorce is based on several teachings, including:

  • Scripture teaching that the two have become one
  • Scriptures like Mark 10:9 state that God has joined couples in marriage and man cannot separate them
  • Marriage was instituted shortly after God created man, signifying its holiness
  • Marriage was created to be permanent

In light of these teachings, it may seem that the Catholic Church is hostile towards those who divorce, regardless of the circumstances or grounds for divorce. This is not the case. The Catholic Church recognizes that divorce in a legal or civil setting may not be evil, particularly if the divorce does not attempt to sever the holy sacrament of marriage.

Catholics even believe that civil divorce is sometimes necessary, as in the case of domestic abuse. Such situations are seen by the Catholic Church as legal separation (though they may legally be called divorce) so long as the spiritual marriage remains intact.

Annulment in the Catholic Church

An alternative option to divorce in the Catholic Church is annulment. Although not an option in many circumstances, annulment is considered valid by the Church when it pertains to marriages that do not meet the requirements of the Catholic Church pertaining to the covenant of marriage. For instance, a marriage between non-Christians who later become Catholics might qualify for annulment if it ends in divorce.

Divorce and Remarriage

One of the most common questions many people have about the Catholic Church and divorce is whether or not remarriage is a viable option. A Catholic marriage, by the sacrament of matrimony, cannot be permitted between two people who have been in previous valid marriages.

A valid marriage is any marriage that is not eligible for annulment according to the Catholic Church doctrine. For instance, two Catholics previously united by the sacramental marriage, even after legally divorced, are not considered divorced by the Catholic Church. They are thus not eligible for remarriage unless one of the spouses has died.

People who have their previous marriage(s) annulled officially by the Catholic Church may be eligible for remarriage. This is because annulment indicates that the couple was never actually married before God in the first place. The couple must still meet the requirements of the Catholic Church pertaining to the sacrament of matrimony, though.

These policies are based on the Catholic teaching that, although Scripture is mistaken as referencing adultery as a reason for divorce, Jesus actually taught that there are no grounds for divorce as a means to remarriage. Remarriage, according to Catholic Church teachings, is not an option for anyone previously married and not widowed.

Consequences of Divorce in the Roman Catholic Church

A common misconception today is that divorced Catholics cannot participate in certain church activities, including the holy sacrament of communion. Official Catholic policy maintains that any Catholic not actively engaging in egregious sin is qualified and even encouraged to partake in communion. That means that legally divorced Catholics who maintain the holy covenant of marriage and are not living in active sin can and should take communion.

Examples of active sin that make a person ineligible to take communion include living with and/or having sexual relations with anyone outside of the covenant of marriage. People engaging in such activities are seen as consciously rebelling against the will of God. As a result, they are not in union with God and should not be united to Him through communion.

Catholics who are not choosing to engage in such sins and who remain as those married before God though legally divorced are actually encouraged to participate in communion in order to be more unified with God.

The Catholic Church also seeks to support those who are legally or civilly divorced. Reconciliation and counseling groups are offered for the divorced in many parishes. Support groups and special activities are hosted for those who are divorced in many parishes as well. Divorced Catholics are also encouraged to participate in general Church activities and gatherings including and outside of mass.

Speculation about Changes in the Church Policy

According to the Catholic Church, the official policy on marriage, divorce, annulment, and remarriage will not change. It has been determined by the Catholic Church based on the Holy Scriptures and has been upheld for centuries, even at great cost.

Still, some speculate that the Catholic Church may change its stance if a pope and the governing body of the Catholic Church were to review the Scriptures and the tradition of the Church. Further, many believe that certain aspects of the policy may change slightly.

For instance, some hope that the tight regulations regarding those who remarry (without annulments) and want to receive communion, might be relaxed. Currently, those in such a situation are considered as living in active sin and are not to participate in communion. Discussions are hoped for regarding these rules as people call on the Church to exemplify Christ’s mercy.

What to Expect During a Roman Catholic Wedding?

A Catholic wedding is in many ways similar to other western wedding celebrations. An officiant stands at the front of the ceremony at an altar. There, vows are read and rings are exchanged. Witnesses face the couple, watching as the ceremony takes place and the couple is united before God.

The details of a Catholic wedding are unique, though. For one, a Catholic priest must be the officiant. Several other differences are apparent.

Here is what you can expect during a Roman Catholic Wedding:

1. A Public Ceremony

Catholic weddings are considered public affairs. Recognized as worship services just like any other Catholic mass, the ceremony is celebrated before God and anyone who chooses to participate as a witness. Every Catholic Wedding takes place as a Nuptial Mass, which is a full Mass administered by a qualified priest in a Catholic parish, according to its rules.

2. A Specific Time Slot

Since Catholic weddings take place as a public nuptial mass in an operating Catholic church, the ceremonies must be scheduled around regular mass. As a result, Catholic weddings do not take place on Saturday nights or Sunday mornings during typical mass service hours. They also cannot be scheduled on particular Holy Days, like Good Friday or Holy Saturday.

Traditionally, nuptial masses are held during the morning or early afternoon. Many couples choose to have their ceremony on a Friday or Saturday during one of those time slots. Receptions that follow are something scheduled directly afterwards as a lunch or early dinner reception. Some couples choose to delay their reception so that it occurs during the dinner hour, a few hours after the ceremony.

3. A Ceremony in a Catholic Church Building

As a sacred act of worship before God, weddings following the Catholic tradition must be carried out in a holy place — a Catholic church. Catholic weddings thus traditionally cannot take place outdoors or in another church denomination’s building.

Depending on the specific parish’s rules, the couple and their loved ones may or may not be able to select a particular church building or decorate the building to fit the theme of the wedding. Most Catholic couples get married in the bride’s church. For couples in which one partner is Catholic and the other is not, the ceremony takes place in the Catholic partner’s parish church.

4. A Specific Structure to the Ceremony

One of the most defining characteristics of a Catholic wedding is its specific structure. Carried out like a Catholic mass, the wedding begins with a typical ceremonial procession. Except that in a Catholic wedding, the priest proceeds down the aisle, followed by members of the wedding party. Music is played all throughout.

When everyone arrives at the altar, the following takes place in order:

  • Greeting
  • Gloria
  • Opening Prayer
  • First Reading
  • First Responsorial Psalm
  • Second Reading
  • Gospel Acclamation
  • Gospel
  • Homily
  • Rite of Marriage
  • Statement of Intentions
  • Exchange of Vows
  • Exchange of Rings
  • Profession of Faith
  • Prayer of the Faithful
  • Liturgy of the Eucharist
  • Presentation of the Gifts
  • Hymn Series
  • The Lord’s Prayer
  • Nuptial Blessing
  • Sign of Peace
  • Hymn
  • Communion
  • Final Rite
  • Blessing of the Couple
  • Recessional

This may seem like a long ceremony based on the length of the list, but each step takes only a short amount of time. The wedding ceremony is often only as long as a traditional mass, lasting just a little over an hour.

In many parishes, the Catholic mass can be altered slightly. Most alternations made by couples include having particular passages read or songs sung. Couples sometimes also add activities like having their parents come forward to pray with them or asking loved ones to read a passage of Scripture. Some couples add their own vows onto the traditional vows as well. Many couples also choose to have special activities they enjoy that are not a part of the mass during their reception.

It should be noted that the sacraments offered during the service are not open to the public, but only to the faithful. Many Catholic masses only offer communion to the couple getting married and, in some cases, the bridal party.

5. A Sacrament of Matrimony

An important part of a Catholic wedding is the sacrament of Matrimony. One of the seven sacred sacraments of the Catholic Church, matrimony as pronounced before God is a part of a Nuptial Mass. The sacrament is administered along with the Eucharist, typically alongside communion.

The symbolism of the sacrament is significant. Signifying the couple’s acceptance of Christ’s sacrifice together and the reflection of their marriage in light of Christ’s union with the Church, the sacrament is very spiritual.

Catholics believe that when the sacrament of matrimony is pronounced, the newlywed couple is officially “one” in Christ. They also “receive the Holy Spirit as the communion of love of Christ and the Church.” This prepares the couple for a lifetime of unity in marriage and in faith.

6. The Bride and/or Groom Must Have Met Certain Requirements

Non-Catholic couples cannot marry in a Catholic Church. Considered a holy place, the Church is seen as sacred and all ceremonies that take place within its walls must be glorifying to God according to the Catholic tradition.

Previously, a Catholic could not marry a Non-Catholic in a traditional Catholic ceremony. The rules have since changed, and such marriages (called mixed-marriages) are allowed. However, there are particular requirements.

The Catholic member of the couple must be able to present a certificate of baptism in the Catholic Church. They must, in front of the partner, promise to continue in their faith and raise their children in the Catholic tradition. This is the case for Catholics marrying Christians of differing denominations. The marriage of a Catholic to a non-religious, completely unbaptized person must be expressly approved by a bishop.

Catholics believe that requirements and restrictions like these are essential to the preservation of the faith. The Church also believes that these requirements protect Catholics from marriage to partners who are hostile to the faith.

Hillary Clinton VS Bernie Sanders – Democratic Party Presidential Primaries, 2016

The Next Step Forward: Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders?

This upcoming election may well be the most important one of this generation. While progress has lurched and sputtered forward over the last eight years, it has been made. We have affordable health care for all, marriage equality, better diplomatic relations with longtime adversaries Cuba and Iran, drawdown of military activity abroad, and so on. However, there are still segments of this country that would like nothing better than to erase the progress we have made as a society and take America backwards rather than forwards. Not even a third Bush would be good enough for these groups – instead they seem ready to elect a radical right-winger like Ted Cruz or a xenophobic demagogue like Donald Trump. Fortunately, the primarily liberal Democratic Party has two very qualified candidates as an alternative.

However, neither Hillary Clinton nor Bernie Sanders should simply be thought of as interchangeable anti-Trump or anti-Cruz candidates. Both are unique in their own right, and while both are at least mostly progressive, they are remarkably different on many issues. Clearing up misconceptions about both and drawing lines between them on various issues as well as practical matters, such as experience and electability, is the best way to go about distinguishing between the two and understanding which candidate is best suited to carry the torch of progress forward for the next four or eight years.

What Differences Are There Between Clinton and Sanders on the Following Issues?

Issue #1: Civil Rights

It is fair to say that in recent years both candidates have by and large stood on the side of progress in this area. However, their overall track record is different. Whereas Sanders marched with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and was arrested for protesting segregation, Clinton worked as part of the Young Republican movement to elect Barry Goldwater – who voted against the Civil Rights Act. In all fairness, Goldwater voted against the Act for what he claimed were constitutional grounds and, despite his vote, was active in the civil rights movement himself. Since then, both candidates have grown and evolved. The American Civil Liberties Union and the Human Rights Campaign score both candidates relatively well – Sanders has a 97% from the ACLU compared to Clinton’s 60%, and Sanders has a 100% from the HRC compared to Clinton’s 89%. Both score 100% from NARAL. Sanders has taken a stronger stance for racial equality, particularly in regards to police violence and prison reform, than Clinton and, also unlike Clinton, opposed the Patriot Act at every opportunity.

Issue #2: Foreign Policy

In the field of foreign policy clearer distinctions emerge between Sanders and Clinton. On current issues, Sanders is somewhat of an isolationist. For instance, he is an advocate of avoiding American involvement in the conflict with ISIS, saying that ISIS is the responsibility of countries in the region to deal with. He also opposed training and arming Syrian rebels, opposed a no-fly zone over Syria, and calls for a full withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan. Clinton supported arming and training foreign troops, calls for strong U.S. involvement in the fight against ISIS, and has not committed to withdrawing troops from Afghanistan. Going back further, Sanders was strongly against the Iraq war, whereas Clinton voted to authorize the war. In fairness to her and her current position, she has since acknowledged that it was a mistake. Sanders is not a complete isolationist or pacifist however – he is just far more loath to support intervention and claims that it should be used only in very specific circumstances. He voted to authorize military action against terrorists after 9/11 and, in 1999, he voted to support NATO bombings in Yugoslavia. In foreign policy, Clinton is decidedly more hawkish than Sanders,

Issue #3: Gun Control

Gun control is an area in which Sanders is historically less liberal than Clinton – and the Clinton campaign has focused on this fact in recent weeks. Due to this, there is more confusion over the position of Sanders on the issue. At the last Democratic debate, Clinton was quick to point out that he voted in favor of the PLCAA, which protects gun manufacturers from liability when their guns are used criminally. Clinton voted against it. Sanders claims that he supported the PLCAA in order to protect small businesses. However, in doing so he voted in favor of a bill that was a top NRA priority. Sanders also voted against the Brady Act, which mandated federal background checks. In contrast, at nearly every other opportunity he has supported background checks and he claims that his vote on Brady was such because he believes it to be a state rather than a federal issue. Regardless, neither is favored by the gun lobby – Clinton has an “F” rating from the NRA and Sanders has a “D-“. At the end of the day, Clinton is distinctly to the left of Sanders when it comes to gun control. At nearly every opportunity she has opposed gun manufacturers and supported gun control legislation. The position of Sanders is more nuanced and case-by-case. A senator from the rural state of Vermont in which state gun control laws are lax and his constituency is generally pro-gun, Sanders claims that he believes in “common sense” gun control.

Issue #4: Healthcare

Healthcare has become a particularly interesting issue in recent weeks, as Clinton surrogates have sought to cast Bernie Sanders as a candidate that would dismantle the ACA. Chelsea Clinton even went as far as saying that Sanders would do away with Medicare. At best, the comments are disingenuous and slightly disheartening in a primary race that has up until this point avoided going overtly negative. At worst, they are an outright lie.

While Clinton has long been a champion of expanding healthcare coverage herself – most famously when she was First Lady – Sanders has been an even stronger advocate of universal healthcare. Long before the ACA – Obamacare to most – was approved, Sanders was repeatedly introducing and reintroducing legislation that would lead towards universal government-provided healthcare. This single-payer model system is occasionally dubbed “Medicare for All”. Sanders supported and helped to draft the Affordable Care Act as he saw it as a step in the right direction, but not the final culmination of the fight for health insurance. For her part, Clinton has fully supported the ACA, but Sanders has consistently wanted to go even further in making sure that all citizens are protected with health insurance. All signs point to the fact that both will work to reinforce and strengthen the ACA. The difference is that Sanders wants to continue to make progress in this area. The efforts of the Clinton campaign to spread disinformation and paint the efforts of Sanders as an attempt to undermine the ACA blatantly and embarrassingly disregard the facts.

Issue #5: Immigration

Immigration is an area in which there is very little pragmatic daylight between Clinton and Sanders. Both support Obama’s executive actions on immigration and both support a path for citizenship for immigrants. Some minority activist groups have protested Clinton’s prior support of private prison corporations and the fact that she previously accepted political donations from private prison corporations, but the Clinton campaign has since announced that they will no longer accept those contributions. On another note, in 2014 Clinton advocated sending undocumented children back to their countries of origin – a position that she drew some fire from liberals for. As a blemish on his immigration record Sanders once opposed a guest worker program. For the most part both candidates are very progressive when it comes to immigration, a trait that is sure to help the party when it comes to the Hispanic/Latino vote in the general election.

Issue #6: Income Inequality

Clinton advocates are sure to deride the inclusion of this topic as a talking point for reasons that will shortly become obvious if they are not already. While both candidates advocate substantial increases to the minimum wage, most of the similarities end there. Sanders has long been an advocate of income inequality reform at all levels, while Clinton has repeatedly sided with Wall Street and big banks. Sanders has gone on the record to say that banks that are deemed “too big to fail” need to be broken up to reduce future systemic risk, while Clinton has advocated for the protection of big banks and Wall Street while soliciting enormous campaign contributions from them. Sanders accepts no such contributions. When it comes to this issue, Sanders is far more populist and progressive than Clinton. More importantly, he has his hands clean and his pockets empty of Wall Street money.

Issue #7: Education

Both Sanders and Clinton have proposed highly progressive education plans, particularly when it comes to higher education. While they both have slightly different approaches, both would result in a comprehensive overhaul of higher education that would make it more or less free. Sanders advocated for fully subsidized tuition at in-state public colleges and universities, while Clinton’s plan requires ten hours of work a week to receive a benefit that would cover tuition, books, and fees at in-state four-year colleges. While both have reasons behind their specific plan, pragmatically the difference is negligible when compared to our current system of rising college costs and indebtedness.

Issue #8: The Environment

One of the consistent themes in the difference between Clinton and Sanders is that Clinton is very supportive of big business. In addition to her alliance with Wall Street, nowhere is this pro-business bias more evident than in Clinton’s stance on environmental issues. Clinton trumpets her environmental plan’s goals of a 700% increase in solar installations and the ability to power the residential grid with renewable energy in 10 years. Clinton plans to pay for this through eliminating some existing tax cuts to big energy companies. While these are certainly laudable compared to the relatively sad state of renewable energy today and the heavy favoring of big oil and coal in our tax code, Clinton’s self-described strong stance on energy and environmental issues doesn’t match her voting record – and pales in comparison to that of Sanders.

Whereas Clinton supported Keystone XL, supported offshore drilling, supported Arctic drilling, and supports tax breaks for fossil fuels, Sanders opposed and opposes them all and wishes to close all applicable fossil fuel tax loopholes. While the Sanders campaign has not yet released a full environmental plan like the Clinton campaign has, his track record on environmental issues, even politically unpopular ones, has been very positive.

Beyond the Issues, What Other Factors Are Worth Considering When Comparing Sanders and Clinton?

Factor #1: Experience

When it comes to political experience, Hillary Clinton is second to none among candidates in both parties. In an official capacity, she was First Lady for eight years, a U.S. Senator for eight years, and Secretary of State for four years. Unofficially, she is the consummate insider not only in Washington, but around the world. The influence of her political network is vast and powerful, as can even be seen even in the scheduling details of the Democratic nomination calendar. She also has experience running for the presidential nomination and has been highly vetted by her own party and opposition alike.

Sanders is no slouch when it comes to experience either, though his resume isn’t as impressive as Clinton’s. He served as mayor in Burlington, Vermont, prior to launching into a political career that took him to the U.S. House and eventually the Senate, where he has served since 2007. He is extremely highly regarded among his constituency and is known for the consistency of his views. While his supporters may make a case that it is a good thing, he cannot lay claim to the same credentials that Clinton has among both Washington insiders and the international community.

Factor #2: Trustworthiness

This factor is by nature subjective and slightly ambiguous, so it can be difficult to discuss. With this in mind, resources like the Pulitzer Prize winning Politifact to measure honesty are useful. Both Sanders and Clinton do remarkably well on Politifact, with 3.32 and 3.37 ratings on a five point scale, respectively. For comparison, Republican frontrunners Ted Cruz, Donald Trump, and Ben Carson rate a 2.1, 1.51, and 1.47, respectively.

When it comes to trustworthiness in regards to having a consistently progressive ideology, InsideGov rates Clinton as slightly more liberal than the average Democratic candidate – though a case can be made that with the country increasingly leaning right the average has been shifted. Sanders is consistently further to the left than Clinton is. This designation seems to match the impression that most people have when comparing the two candidates on the issues.

Additionally, it is also worth pointing out once again that Sanders has long stood for campaign finance reform and does not have a PAC raising money for him. He believes that corporate dollars are a corrupting influence on politics and instead boasts the largest individual small-donor network in history. Clinton relies extensively on PACs and large corporate donations to fund her campaign,

Factor #3: Electability

At first glance, Hillary Clinton seems to run away with this category. Not only does she have one of the largest pre-existing presidential campaign structures in history, but she also has name recognition and cache across the country and the globe. She was widely regarded as the presumptive nominee. This is not the first time that she has been in that position either, however. In 2008 it was widely assumed that she would triumph with ease over Barack Obama, but she struggled and ended up losing out to a more progressive, less compromised candidate despite a negative turn in her campaign that, at its lowest, featured questionably xenophobic attack ads. In similar fashion, her campaign has begun to flirt with going on the attack now that Sanders has narrowed her once-insurmountable lead.

Clinton still holds a huge lead among Democratic Party insiders and their endorsements. According to Nate Silver’s FiveThirtyEight, Clinton has 458 official party endorsements, compared to 2 for Sanders.

However, there is more to the race than the endorsements of fellow politicians. Most polls show either Clinton or Sanders beating any of the Republican frontrunners in the general election, but Sanders usually triumphs by significantly more. FiveThirtyEight breaks down other statistics that serve to help explain the difference between the two. According to the data that FiveThirtyEight broke down from a Huffington Post pollster, Clinton has a 42% favorable rating. Sanders is at 38%. Clinton’s unfavorable rating is at 50%, while Sanders is at merely 35%. Broken down further, Sanders has a net favorable rating of +3, while Clinton has a net favorable rating of -8. While we can see that this also clearly indicates that Sanders is much less well known than Clinton, we shouldn’t ignore the warning signs for Clinton.

Despite Clinton’s vast political network and huge corporate donor base, she isn’t the most electable candidate of the two on the Democratic ticket. Not only is Sanders more electable (+3), but Clinton is even more unelectable (-8) than Sanders is electable.

In Conclusion:

While both candidates are have their merits and would be, for the most part, strong champions of progress in this country, Sanders has been the most consistently progressive, as indicated by his recent endorsement by the organization MoveOn. In addition, it seems that nothing stirs up the Republican base more than the prospect of Clinton winning the presidency. The potentially significant effects that putting another jolt of energy into the Republican voter base could have on down-ticket candidates in other elections should not be ignored either. While both candidates are highly qualified and are vastly better than the specter of any of the Republican alternatives, it looks like the best bearer of the torch of progress would be Bernie Sanders.

Uber vs. Lyft: Customer Service, Phone Number, Tipping System etc.

The sharing economy is becoming the norm as many people struggle to make ends meet, which is why companies such as Lyft and Uber are flourishing. Uber has rocked the boat in the ridesharing industry, but Lyft is a rising star that poses the greatest threat. Uber is a company founded in 2009 that allows everyday people to hail a ride by way of smartphone app, and users can track the driver en route to their location. Lyft started in 2012, originally growing from ridesharing company Zimride which was founded in 2007, which provides the same type of service as Uber. Both companies provide a convenient way of getting around town, but which company is the best solution for consumers in terms of service and cost?

Uber Customer Service Phone Number: N/A; Email –

Lyft Customer Service Phone Number: No Number Available  ; Email –

Customer Satisfaction

It should be noted that the quality of customer service has gone downhill for both companies, as a typical email response from Uber and Lyft takes two to five days. This actually has more to do with the growing number of responses due to rising popularity, therefore customer service could improve in the future as each company grows. Lyft also maintains a 24-hour emergency call service center, including a separate email for non-emergencies, whereas Uber has an online support forum that allows customers to submit questions or comments.

In terms of arrival times, Uber cars tend to arrive faster than Lyft cars, but the wait times between companies are small. For example, a typical wait in the afternoon in New York City is usually five minutes for Uber and eight minutes for Lyft, while the evening entails three minutes for Uber and six minutes for Lyft. Busy spots such as New York’s financial district would take one minute for both companies, but only in the morning. While wait times are virtually the same, the riding experience for each company is a stark contrast.

If clients are looking for a fun and engaging experience, Lyft would be a more suited option since drivers are usually casual in their demeanor and will treat customers as a newfound friend. Drivers usually greet passengers with a friendly fist-bump before the ride, and riders are encouraged to sit in the front seat rather than the back. Further, Lyft stands out with its large pink mustache symbol plastered on the front of each vehicle, and employees provide riders with a fun riding experience laced with lively conversation and entertaining themes and activities, such as Harry Potter themes, Trivia or Karaoke.

On the other hand, Uber drivers are more professional, opening doors for passengers, and they are usually dressed more formal. If customers wish to ride in a modern vehicle, Uber is the best choice because the company encourages drivers to use new cars. The apparent differences stem from the culture of each company, as Lyft believes in a fun-filled party atmosphere, while Uber adheres to a more traditional form of transportation. People who are averse to conversations with drivers and would rather keep to themselves would generally better off with Uber, but for those who are open to a bit of adventure and interesting conversation, Lyft is the ideal company.

The services for either company usually starts at $1, with $1.50 per mile and $0.25 per minute, a price scale which undercuts traditional taxi cab fare of a $2 beginning rate and mileage rates that are 20 percent more than ridesharing companies. However, users stand a higher chance of getting a cheaper rate with Lyft because drivers are not required to ride in new cars, and Lyft offers better deals as a way of competing against Uber. In the grand scheme of things, rates may change based on the city, and riders are usually charged higher rates during peak times, with prices surging higher in more populous cities such as San Francisco or Los Angeles, and herein lies a noticeable difference between each company.

For example, a Lyft ride during peak hours could shoot a rate as high as 200 percent, but it would never be anything over since the company imposes a cap. Uber does not have a limit and may increase rates as high as seven or eight times, but they will cut rates during emergencies or extreme circumstances such as natural disasters. The best way to dodge the price surge is to avoid peak hours altogether, but Uber is better at informing riders about how much they will pay during busy times before they place an order.

The season is another factor that must be taken into account, especially as the two companies compete for customers. Lyft recently announced a price cut in 33 cities during the winter season, but not in New York City, while Uber announced a price slash of 10 percent in 100 cities throughout North America, including NYC. Uber has gained significant headway in NYC, and the two companies have especially been at odds in other major cities such as San Francisco. In order to counter Uber’s foothold in NYC, Lyft has partnered with the medical industry for the purpose of transporting patients to their doctors, but only time will tell if such a partnership will lead to a greater portion of market-share. The bottom line is that the rivalry has less to do with territory and more to do with attracting as many customers as possible, and another way they are doing this is t
hrough various coupon deals.

Online Offers

Passengers looking for the best deal are better off with Lyft because of the intense competition with Uber. One example is a $50 credit reward for first-time drivers that applies to their first ride, meaning that each first-time passenger gets a free ride, and remaining credits can be used on future rides. Currently, Uber only offers a $20 credit, but this is to be expected as the company is more established and less incentivized to offer extra perks.

App Functions

Both app services are very similar since they were developed around the same time, and both apps allow users to punch in the destination address before they are picked up. Customers can also track the route in real time as the driver heads to the location, but many users have stated that the Lyft app is more accessible and user-friendly. Also, Lyft’s in-app tip provides more convenience than the Uber app, which does not have a tip function whatsoever.

Service Options

When it comes to service, both companies offer numerous options. Uber in particular has UberEats for food delivery, Uber XL, accepting rides of six people or more, UberPlus, which offers rides for 4 people or more in a plush vehicle, and Uberblack for limo rides. Lyft has three levels of service, with Lyft Plus offering rides for six people in a larger vehicle, and Lyft Line allows strangers to share a ride while saving money in the process, including the standard fare as the third option. To ensure repeated business, Lyft customers can rate their driving experience, and if their rating falls below three stars, the customer is never pared with that driver again, but the driver can rate the passenger as well.

Company Locations

In terms of presence, Uber has a wider expansion, with operations in 300 cities in 60 nations worldwide. Lyft only operates in 60 U.S. cities and has no international presence. Both companies generally operate in the same cities, but pedestrians can find a ride much faster with Uber because it is a more established ridesharing brand and has more cars on the streets.

Heated Competition

To make matters worse for Lyft, management is dealing with the issue of company poaching, as Uber offers free lunches and a $500 bonus to join the company. However, Lyft applies the same tactics as it secures additional funding, offering the same signing bonuses and other perks. Lyft got ahead of the game by not taking any commissions from drivers and cutting rates by 10 percent, while Uber retained its full commission system. However, Lyft later restored its commission policy but reduced commissions based on the amount of hours a driver works. Not to be outdone, Uber has resorted to questionable tactics, such as ordering 5,000 Lyft rides and cancelling the orders at the last minute. While not illegal, critics have derided such an unethical practice, but this isn’t the first time Uber has been accused of shady activity.

In a push to get drivers to own nicer cars, Uber is accused of pushing them to apply for sub-prime auto loans, the very same types of loans that caused the Great Recession in 2008. The sub-prime scam has taken a different form through auto loans, and to make matters worse, the Justice Department issued subpoenas to two of Uber’s financing partners: Santander Consumer USA and General Motors. Uber is tied to the investigation because some of the loan applications directly link with allegations of falsified income and employment status, and whether lenders fully disclosed such information to investors.

This type of fraud is one reason why the U.S. economy suffered immensely eight years ago, and Uber’s name stands a high chance of being dragged in the mud if its contractors are forced into risky loans that they could never pay back. On the flip side, Lyft is making less risky investments, partnering with GM in establishing nationwide rental hubs which allow employees to rent cars instead of owning them. If more of these hubs are established, it could attract more workers who may want to avoid taking out auto loans, and it could be a perfect tool for poaching Uber drivers.

Uber pushes drivers into newer vehicles to maintain its clean, professional image, but this could only end up backfiring as it forces workers into needless debt, while potentially dealing a blow to the company’s overall image, especially when the auto sub-prime bubble eventually bursts. Uber has also been accused of wishing to dig into the personal lives of friends and family members of journalists who write critical pieces of the company, and this will inevitably hurt the brand image of the company as many moral-minded consumers would refuse to do business with a company that resorts to unscrupulous tactics.

Worker Treatment

Overall, Uber and Lyft support drivers in times of emergency, such as reimbursing drivers for ticket violations at airports, or when passengers damage vehicles. Uber and Lyft employees are treated decently, but when it comes to a choice between Uber and Lyft, 9 out of 10 workers would choose to work for Lyft due to the company’s less rigid ratings policy, most notably the addition of a tipping app feature. Uber’s ratings system is noteworthy because it does not give drivers the chance to counter any claims or negative reviews from the customer, especially for circumstances beyond the driver’s control, such as language barriers with foreign drivers or heavy traffic. Those who have worked for Uber claim that drivers cannot get a rating below 4.7 and face the risk of being fired
as a result. Lyft is less stringent if drivers get bad ratings, and workers who wish to avoid the fear of potentially being fired for low ratings would be better off at Lyft.

To be fair, Uber accepts far more passengers and would naturally receive more negative complaints from customers, but the issue of letting drivers go based on a number of negative reviews does not make the company a safe place in terms of job security. However, many workers remain with Uber simply because they are more likely to get work than through Lyft, and Uber is better established and well-known nationally and internationally. To maximize their income stream, some workers contract for Uber and Lyft at the same time, since they are free to do so as employee contractors, and workers who drive for both companies simultaneously notice Uber’s lack of in-app tip functionality.

This may not seem like a big deal on the surface, but it hurts drivers over time as many passengers do not carry enough cash on-hand to give drivers an appropriate tip. Lyft’s app is different because it gives users certain gratuity choices, including a custom amount. This puts Uber drivers at a disadvantage because they are forced to rely on cash-only tips from customers, and the lack of tipping feature prompted a petition to the company to add a tipping option, but Uber is unwilling to budge on the issue and shows no sign of changing anytime soon.

This is because tipping goes against Uber’s core philosophy, but a change in worldview is long overdue as drivers continuously lose a vital revenue stream. Times are changing as less people have physical cash in their pockets, and Uber will have no choice but to upgrade its app to include a tipping function, especially if the rideshare company wishes to retain employees and satisfy customers. The no-tipping philosophy is a major problem for Uber, as it could be a determinant factor in whether potential drivers will work for the company, and it could be another issue that Lyft could use to poach more drivers away from the company.

When it comes to annual income for both companies, this is based on how many hours a driver commits per week, mileage and city location. For full-time UberX drivers, Uber reportedly pays its employees $90,000 a year in New York and $74,000 in San Francisco, which on the surface is not a bad chunk of change in cities with high living standards, until such expenses as fees and fuel costs are factored in. Drivers may spend over $14,000 a year on various expenses, but the take-home pay is still decent compared to other professions. Some Uber drivers do not make enough money to earn a decent a living, while others make over $15 an hour.

The same type of salary applies to Lyft, but drivers can make anywhere from $75K-$110K on a yearly basis in major cities. Drivers of both companies are paid handsomely for their work, but Lyft is more likely to offer higher salaries as a poaching tool against its rival. Employees for Uber and Lyft do not receive benefits because they are independent contractors, and prominent economists such as Robert Reich has leveled criticism at ridesharing companies like Uber for encouraging unstable job positions as the norm in society. However, a majority of taxi jobs offer contract employment, with the average Uber/Lyft driver being paid more than the average taxi driver, and ridesharing drivers usually work less hours. It is safe to say that Uber and Lyft treat their employees fairly in terms of pay, and workers have a chance to make a substantial yearly sum in many locations.

Funding Competition

However, the restoration of the commission system shows that Lyft still has plenty of work to do in catching up to Uber and cannot afford substantial losses in revenue. Lyft achieved great success with $250 million in financing in 2014, but was towered by the $1.2 billion Uber raised in June 2014, and Uber continues to outperform the newer company in financing. Currently, Lyft is faring against its competitor and has major backing from investors as well, but the money keeps rolling in as Uber plans to raise $2.1 billion in funds to expand operations. The money would go to widening food delivery service, including driverless cars, and the company is expanding in Asia, spending $1 billion alone in China.

At this juncture, it is imperative for Lyft to meet its funding goals in the future, as the company lost $127 million in the first half of 2015, while Uber’s gross revenue expanded 200 percent that same year. Lyft still remains strong as it announced a closing of one billion dollars on a $500 million investment from General Motors, and the company is valued at $5.5 billion, as of 2016. Lyft may be behind of Uber in terms of value, but it is the fastest-growing ridesharing company in the United States, and the company shows promise with regard to expansion and innovation. With that, the key is achieving the latest algorithms that logistically allow drivers to get to a certain pick-up point much faster, and the companies keep building on top of each other to gain new customers. For instance, both companies debuted a new carpool sharing service that is cheaper than standard prices, but Lyft has a slight edge overall because management hired a former Netflix chief of analytics. Each company runs neck and neck in terms of technology, but the main battle lies not only between Lyft and Uber, but ridesharing companies and taxi cab companies.

In Conclusion

Many taxi drivers and local officials have complained of the ridesharing business model, as drivers do not have to go through the same regulations and fee structure as standard taxi cab companies would. On the other hand, no one can stop a person from sharing a ride with another person, and companies like Uber countered by criticizing the taxi cab industry for its repeated practice of refusing to offer minorities cab rides, and has used that as part of a marketing campaign. Bottom line, the government and taxi cab industry will be the biggest losers because the ridesharing economy is popular, and the free market has spoken regardless of what the law says.

Times are tough in an economy where too many people are not making enough money, and they are looking for new ways to maximize their dollars wherever possible. Uber and Lyft are competing for more customers, and passengers and drivers will be the ultimate winners as both companies offer incentives and price reductions. Regardless of a customer’s preference, Uber and Lyft offer the same level of service, with some extra perks along the way that will appeal to different customers from all walks of life. At the end of the day, both companies achieve the same result for their customers, getting from Point A to Point B.

Catholic Health Initiatives

Catholic Health Initiatives refers to a non-profit organization whose mission is to nurture the healing ministry of the Catholic Church and bring new life, energy, and viability to individuals. One of the largest faith based organization, Catholic Health Initiatives has its headquarters in Inverness, Colorado. The organization operates in seventeen states. Some of the facilities it boasts of are seventy-eight hospitals, forty long term care residential living and assisted facilities, two accredited nursing colleges etc. Others are home health agencies, and community health services organizations. CHI seeks to leave this world a better place. It is in this regard that it continues to leave a positive impact among the less fortunate in society today. Some of the activities the organization engages in are providing free clinics, providing food to the hungry, offering shelter, providing education and engaging in research activities aimed at improving the livelihoods of the poor individuals.

Shocking statistics indicate that millions of people die as a result of health related issues. The numbers are overwhelming. They continue to rise as each day passes. It is important to do what can be done to bring down this numbers. This is exactly what catholic health initiatives sought to address when the program was starting a few years back. A group of health care leaders form the Catholic Church embarked on a journey of strengthening the health ministry for the sake of the future. This was in the year 1995. They realized that the healthcare area required drastic changes. The evolving environment on healthcare required a huge change in its organizational structures. Catholic health initiatives began its operations on 1 July 1996.

Over the years, you cannot deny that this program has transformed many lives throughout the world. There is no doubt about that. Lives are changing everyday as a result of the activities of the catholic health initiatives. The truth of the matter is that quite a number of changes have taken place in the health sector. However, more can be done to ensure that more lives are changed. More people are looking for someone to come and educate, feed, provide clothes and shelter for them.

Time to act is now. Waiting only causes more and more problems. Catholic health initiatives have initiatives that seek to change the way people think and live their lives. The good thing is that this organization has impacted people from all over the world.